Top Stories
![](/resize/220x180/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/13014618/NA1_DOM_EllaChan_APE_AndreaRoseOatesProfile_20250212_009-scaled.jpg)
Andrea-Rose Oates claims Unsung Hero Award for nonprofit ‘Girlz Rize’
Andrea-Rose Oates, SU junior, received the Unsung Hero Award honoring her community service and advocacy for girls' education. Read more »
![](/resize/220x180/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/12213232/tim-rudd-v2-flynn-ledoux-editor_720.png)
Opinion: Tim Rudd’s senseless rampage requires his accountability
Rather than fostering conversations on accountability within our local government and valid concerns from Rudd on financial transparency, he used his platform and voice to target Owens. Read more »
![](/resize/220x180/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/12223059/domJoeZhao_ESWG_SledHockey_20250202-76.jpg)
Central New York Flyers sled hockey brings inclusion, community to the ice
The Central New York Flyers sled hockey team is an adaptive recreational hockey team. With most of its members having disabilities, it is an accessible alternative to ice hockey. Read more »
I thought when reading the headline that this would be a graphic that compared the various building campaigns that occurred during each chancellors’ tenure, (i.e. 12 campus plans at the beginning/end of each) showing the most recent campus expansion into the city. That would be a more interesting study.
SU has put up some good looking building… that have stood the test of time from a design perspective. AND SU has some disasters. If SU had stayed with a similar classical look (and neo-cassical), the campus would look much better. Instead SU goes with the ‘most modern’ trend of the time, which becomes outdated in 15 or so years. Example: the new Newhouse building. Hence, we have an odd mix of styles… some beautiful (Crouse, HOL, Hendricks, Maxwell), some okay, and some horrible (just about anything built between 1940 and 1980).