Top Stories
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/24b60/24b609b3d1a6e1a65eeea084216f1e65ca9ae100" alt=""
SU community reflects on 3-year anniversary of Russia-Ukraine conflict
On the third anniversary of the Russia-Ukraine war, Syracuse’s Ukrainian community reflects on resiliency and the ongoing fight for peace. Read more »
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a48d6/a48d6eb085234eecf151553a563b40394688f028" alt=""
Britni Smith’s playoff pedigree powers the Orange through postseason run
Following an eight-year tenure as an assistant at Clarkson with two NCAA titles, Britni Smith is using her postseason experience to boost SU. Read more »
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a8108/a8108bc5105578e2270f5a55d653d2238900514f" alt=""
Opinion: RFK Jr. condemns SSRI use amid student mental health crisis
Our country elected a leader who appointed a health secretary who’s now working to make nationwide prescription reform with little to no scientific backing. Read more »
I thought when reading the headline that this would be a graphic that compared the various building campaigns that occurred during each chancellors’ tenure, (i.e. 12 campus plans at the beginning/end of each) showing the most recent campus expansion into the city. That would be a more interesting study.
SU has put up some good looking building… that have stood the test of time from a design perspective. AND SU has some disasters. If SU had stayed with a similar classical look (and neo-cassical), the campus would look much better. Instead SU goes with the ‘most modern’ trend of the time, which becomes outdated in 15 or so years. Example: the new Newhouse building. Hence, we have an odd mix of styles… some beautiful (Crouse, HOL, Hendricks, Maxwell), some okay, and some horrible (just about anything built between 1940 and 1980).